Notice: Undefined index: reset in /var/www/html/wp-content/mu-plugins/cets_blog_defaults.php on line 733

Deprecated: define() was called with an argument that is deprecated since version 3.0.0! The constant VHOST is deprecated. Use the boolean constant SUBDOMAIN_INSTALL in wp-config.php to enable a subdomain configuration. Use is_subdomain_install() to check whether a subdomain configuration is enabled. in /var/www/html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5497
Blog - Exeter Film Studies PGR Community - Page 2

Soldiers, Cinemas and the First World War by Chris Grosvenor

Every day I read stories about men suffering through the horrors of the First World War. I should correct that: they’re not stories, they are real experiences, real lives and real facts. Necessarily, my research on the provision of film entertainment for British and Dominion soldiers during WWI means learning much about the lives of those who fought and died for their country: both the good times and the bad. As a researcher, it means confronting the harsh realities of war on a day-to-day basis, and despite being a century removed from the experiences found in the war diaries, newspapers and other documents I examine, the images and experiences I come across are no less harrowing, heartbreaking or poignant. Reading through the war diaries of a particular division or battalion, you begin to feel the ebbs and flows of the conflict, the highs and lows, the much needed periods of “rest” behind the lines and the dreadful anticipation of returning to the trenches. The casualty lists and statistics are staggering in themselves, but it is the personal narratives of loss and suffering that resonate the most. First-hand accounts of the conflict – descriptions of daily life on the front lines – places everything in front of you in a very real way. The immediacy, emotion and honesty that are found in the faded lines of a soldier’s diary, a diary you hold in your hands one-hundred years after it had made its way through the horrific conditions of trench warfare – even if its owner was not as fortunate – puts everything in perspective.

The fact that the same soldier visited a divisional cinema in the hope of forgetting, for a time at least, the horrors of the war is an equally moving sentiment. It’s very easy for us in the 21st Century to look back on the people who endured and suffered through the Great War, either at home or on the front, as being far removed from ourselves. Their lives must have been so different, we tell ourselves. Their interests and habits, how they passed the time and enjoyed themselves, seem so archaic. Many people today would find it difficult to place themselves in the shoes of such a person.

Outdoor Screen 2
An open air cinema on the Western Front. Source: Imperial War Museum.

However, if I were to take one thing away from my research up to this point, it would be that the presence of the cinema on the front lines has compacted the distance in space and time between myself and those who fought in the war. Of course, the generation of men and women who experienced the war are exactly the same as us, with the same fears, hopes and desires. But for me, there is something very moving about the fact that whilst living through a conflict of such unprecedented scale and brutality, soldiers would turn to the cinema as a form of comfort and escape from the immediate dangers and disturbing sights of the battlefield.

‘Fancy seeing a cinema show within the enemy’s shell fire!’ one soldier proclaimed in 1915. His disbelief may equal our own today, perhaps. The idea that the bulky, impractical technology needed to project film made its way on to the front line is a baffling notion in and of itself. Yet, dozens, even hundreds of makeshift cinemas did find a home on the battlefields of the First World War, established in dilapidated barns, shoddy huts or even in the open air. These cinemas, and the films they showed, most notably the films of Charlie Chaplin and other contemporary comedians, brightened the lives and raised the morale of those in the midst of the veritable hell on earth that the war had fostered. They turned to the cinema to ‘relieve the monotony and depression of trench warfare’. ‘It’s like being at home’ wrote another soldier, a sentiment shared by many. ‘Oh how we laughed – laughed as we had never laughed before’ proclaimed another about the antics of Chaplin. Like it is today, the cinema was a place where soldiers relaxed, met their friends and shared a laugh or two. On a day like today, it’s important to remember that these people were just the same as us, sharing the same interests and passions. Even with the distance of a century, soldiers would flock to front line cinemas just as we visit our local Vue or Picturehouse, for comfort, for friendship, to enjoy the film on screen and to escape, for a time at least, from the world outside.

______________________________________

After studying English Literature and Film Studies as an undergraduate at the University of Exeter (2010-13), followed by an MA in Film Studies at the University of Warwick (2013-14), Chris is now a PhD student at the University of Exeter. He is currently researching the history of cinema entertainment for troops at home and on the front lines during the First World War, a project which is supervised by Dr Joe Kember and Dr Debra Ramsay. His research interests include British silent cinema and the films of Charlie Chaplin. Read Chris’s research profile here.

‘If you think you’re too small to make a difference, you haven’t spent a night with a mosquito’ by Anna Sowa

The creative industry, especially that of film, is exceptionally diverse and fragmented – but a few large organisations seem to hold all the power in their hands. This creates significant challenges to the ‘micro’ companies with less than 10 employees (CBI, 2014), which make up 85.4% of the sector. I sometimes wonder how my PhD by practice at the London Film School/ University of Exeter can contribute anything to the sector: how can a small producer make any difference when standing up against the expertise of well-established production houses that have been in the industry since beginning of time? After all, I’m just a tiny fraction among the 85.4%…

23

The moment I heard about the IBC Conference in Amsterdam, I knew I had to go there. This year’s theme was ‘Transformation in the Digital Era: Leadership, Strategy and Creativity in Media and Entertainment’ which resonated well with the nature of my PhD. But to top it all off, the creative keynote was to be delivered by the multi-award winning producer Lord David Puttnam. He is the producer behind films like ‘The Mission’, ‘Chariots of Fire’ and ‘The Killing Fields’ and is regarded as a classic example of a creative producer, so naturally his speech was the highlight for me.

In his talk, Puttnam pointed out that technological advancements have enabled us to deliver images better than ever before. However, at the same time we have lost our ability as a society to make judgments. He emphasised the crucial role the media plays in this era of ‘post-truth politics’. Puttnam said, “The role of the media is absolutely fundamental to the way we see ourselves, we see our future, the way we actually regard our own histories and the way we begin to sort out our problems.” There is a constant conflict between the truthfulness, profitability and entertainment value of content – and it is the media’s responsibility to ensure messages are not distorted, and that audiences understand them.

Incontrovertibly, Puttnam sees climate change as the ultimate existential crisis of our times. After an 18-year break from the film industry, Puttnam has returned to make a film on climate change, ‘Arctic 30‘. The film is a call-to-action to tackle climate change, and suggests that today’s society is suffering from the ‘boiling frog’ syndrome, whereby people are unaware of gradual changes even though they will have significant negative consequences.

Finally, after his keynote Puttnam also pointed out that lack of good management, particularly in the creative sector, is what hinders business growth in the UK. According to Puttnam, creative management is more complex than management in any other sector and there is a need for greater understanding of the process and an increase in training.

16

So what does all this mean for me? Not a long ago, I came across an African saying that summarises aptly where I am now in relation to my PhD: “If you think you’re too small to make a difference, you haven’t spent a night with a mosquito.” Of course, the mosquito makes a difference in an annoying way but the principle is the same. Through my work at Chouette Films, a green film production company I co-founded and where I now work as a producer, I bring to light issues that would otherwise remain unheard of – and work with collaborators who would normally not be in a position to afford the cost of service of the film industry, such as academics or non-profit organisations. The entertainment value or profit we make is only secondary to our drive for social change. Speaking to potential investors, for whom the financial profit of Chouette Films is the only priority, I would occasionally wonder whether our social drive was the best way forward. But listening to Puttnam filled me with confidence in the fact that there are certain areas where we should never compromise.

It is particularly encouraging for me to see Puttnam caring so passionately about climate change. Seeing him return to his career to make a film that aims to mobilise people to take action against climate change is exceptionally powerful to me as we share the same passion. In our work at Chouette Films, we combine our creative talent with a whole range of green tech solutions and sustainable practices to minimise the carbon footprint of our film activities. Puttnam’s talk gave me hope in the fact that we can make a difference: whether we’re a micro business or a well-established industry professional with several years of experience, we’re striving towards the same goal. He quoted Gov. Jay Inslee from Washington State, who said, “We are the first generation to feel the impact of climate change and the last to actually do something about it.” And I have no doubt the film industry has an immensely important role in leading the change we all must embrace.

I am also delighted to see Puttnam’s involvement in the new Executive MBA for the Creative Industries programme at Ashridge Business School as there are many similarities with my own work: in my PhD, I focus on the role of the producer as creative force in documentary filmmaking for social change. I’m testing Peter Bloore’s idea of the creative triangle of director, writer and producer, which he developed for fiction film, to see how it could be adjusted to documentary filmmaking. The geometric shape of collaboration in documentary is certainly not a triangle. It could be a pentagon, heptagon – or perhaps there are no fixed rules? But listening to Puttnam helped me understand that I can make a difference – and no matter how small our work might seem, it will never be insignificant. In fact, I’m even excited about the challenges that we, the 85.4% of companies in the sector, are facing. After all, constraint only fuels creativity.

Watch the full creative keynote by Puttnam here

_______________________

Anna Sowa is a documentary film producer with a strong background in international affairs policy and academic research. After completing her BA in Arabic with International Relations, Anna continued her professional and academic interest in international development at SOAS, University of London where she graduated with a distinction MSc Migration, Mobility and Development. She is a PhD by practice candidate at the London Film School/ University of Exeter researching the role of the producer in documentary filmmaking. Her project is supervised by Professor Will Higbee at the University of Exeter and Jane Roscoe, Director of the London Film School. She is the co-founder of Chouette Films, a green film production company committed to using film as a tool for social change.

Skip to toolbar